Skip navigation

Convoy of US military in Afghanistan

Unless in the next few hours President Obama suffers an epiphany and follows the measured advice sent out by Michael Moore today – which is sure not to happen – the United States of America will dispatch another 34,000 soldiers (and who knows what number of private mercenaries in this or that disguise) to Afghanistan.   Whatever loquacious verbiage Obama dresses this in, whatever carefully rationalized logic he enunciates, whatever firm exit strategy he outlines, there will be more needed visits to Dover, more body bags, far more dead Afghani’s cited as “collateral damage” and however behind the 8 ball he’d been set up by the Bush/Cheney crew, this war will be Obama’s.  And unless he possesses some mystical jujitsu hitherto unseen in the tribal hinterlands of “the graveyard of Empires,” America is likely to stumble forward, bleeding non-existent monies, the “homeland” crumbling, and the field will be open for rabid Right to lash out still more at the “nigger in the White House.”  And Obama will limp through his one-term, hounded both from the left and right, having blown his supporters not once, but twice.    The Wall Street bailout that seems not to have stopped the rising unemployment while it did resume the multi-billion dollar bonuses, and now the further Afghan war to suck money from whatever domestic fix-ups could have been made, will be his administration’s death-warrant.   In its wake a majority of Americans who eagerly voted, after 8 years of illegitimate misgovernment by Bush/Cheney, for Change You Can Believe In ™, will feel bitterly short-changed.   At some point the fear and distress of being down-sized, dis-homed, and stripped of all sense of self-respect will either reduce America to a vast herd of Orwellian sheep, or a hornets nest of anger.   Or both.   Given the ready availability of guns in America the customary cycle of shoot-’em-ups is likely to escalate to a non-stop roar, and the home-bred resentful patriots and terrorists are likely to make Timothy McVeigh and Major Hasan look like a mere prelude to the real action.

Thomas Friedman, pundit, NY Times columnist

In the past week the New York Times has printed two Opinion page items which have drawn a firestorm of responses. The first was from Thomas Friedman, self-appointed expert on American foreign policy, a neo-con in vaguely more reasonable dress, and a rabid supporter of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, including being an active participant in the lying chicanery which was foisted on the American public to whip their gonads to a fury.  In his column, America vs The Narrative, Friedman painted a picture of ungrateful Muslims who didn’t acknowledge or realize all the million good things America has done for them in the last decades.   This begot a massive 700 responses, which I read, and about 2/3rds of which took him to task for his myopic or willfully fraudulent sense of history.  My response was this:

As customary, Mr Friedman chooses to flatten the world into self-serving simplifications. Today it is his compressed version of Muslim (Arabic mostly) aversion to Mr Friedman’s view of history. His history starts quite recently and neglects the Crusades (remember Bush’s slip of the tongue [?] early on in our Iraq adventure, the adventure very loudly supported by Mr Friedman). It neglects centuries of Western incursions, imperializing, theft and deal-making of the most sordid kind, including naturally the grand-theft plotting to take over Iraqi oil fields as a clearly dominant function of the so-called war in Iraq. Or of US involvement in overthrowing a legitimately elected Iranian leader who happened to lean left. Or myriad other meddlesome actions in the middle-east. It neglects the DU littered landscapes of Iraq and Afghanistan.

Rather Mr Friedman cites chapter and verse of supposed Western do-goodism, saying “But for every Abu Ghraib, our soldiers and diplomats perpetrated a million acts of kindness aimed at giving Arabs and Muslims a better chance to succeed with modernity and to elect their own leaders.” Such as chronically supporting tyrants who suppressed those things Mr Friedman now champions, because it was useful in some demented American policymakers minds.

As Mr Friedman would have it, the soldiers about to embark from Ft Hood for Iraq or Afghanistan were “innocent”. Just as he would have it that there are no grounds for Muslim/Arabic resentment towards things Western or American. Soldiers are never innocent; they are trained, equipped and governmentally sanctioned and directed killers. And American foreign policy has for long decades been detrimental to Arabic interests, and willfully so, and is anything but “innocent.”

Mr Friedman would like to wave his magic flattening wand and make it all not so; he’d like to erase history and then blame everything on Muslims who have been cynically used and abused by western policymakers, whether for oil or anti-communist crusades or geo-political/military bases.

Being a propagandist for America’s basest interests, he now feigns surprise and dismay that what goes round, comes round. If Muslim’s are easily led into a warped narrative displeasing to Mr Friedman’s eyes, he should look more carefully at one of the cheerleaders of the authors of that narrative: in the mirror.

In my hasty reading of all responses, most of those in support verged on illiterate, rabid right-wing cant being the language used.   Given the supposed “librul” slant of the Times, one supposes this percentage is right and not too indicative of a national pattern, but the anger and heat was tangible.  One wonders how much longer Mr Friedman can either delude himself, or drive safely to his home outside Washington, in Bethesda Maryland, just by the Bethesda Country Club (drop in some time for a coffee and talk):

Mr Friedman of late has talked up going green, carbon footprints, etc., of which he must know a lot.

The other column, The Jobs Imperative, just yesterday, was by Paul Krugman, hammering away (again) at the (non) jobs situation, and the need for the government to get very pro-active in doing something to generate jobs  –  for humanitarian purposes, and for economic ones.   And as well for the national well-being.  This too begot an avalanche of responses, this time more mixed, with seemingly half saying drop taxes, get government and regulations out of the way and the good old Market Economy will work its magic (like it did the last 8 years), and the other half saying mostly, yes, but too little too late.   The heat on both sides was again visceral.

If these two items are in the least indicative, the nation is extremely angry, the right for its usual unreasonable reasons, and the liberal/left for feeling betrayed by their guy in the White House, the likable Mr Obama whose reasonableness seems no longer suited to the temperament of the country.

As a basketball player Obama should see a squeeze play when it’s coming.  Between the honchos of Wall Street and the brass of the Pentagon, he’s been taken to the cleaners, and Main Street is feeling left out.   There is little in the news that hints at some economic upturn, in fact everything points the other way.  Dubai, alternative universe Vegas playground of the international jet-set (as well as new home to Cheney’s beloved Halliburton) is going belly up,  as are a string of other derivatived-to-death leveraged-out nations following the Iceland swoon:  Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Romania, Bulgaria, Hungary, Greece, and sure to hit the news in just a bit will be the rest of Eastern Europe, and some of Western Europe as well (Italy is foundering now).  Across the globe are vast skyscrapers built to accommodate the bustling business that isn’t there, and commercial foreclosures are next in line, and then national defaults.  Among the countries courting such is none other than the good old US of A, in hock to its neck and waiting for the executioners sword when interest rates on all that borrowed dough pops up.   Well, good luck.

Jeff Wall visits Afghanistan

Obama’s window of time is very short, and he’ll probably close it with his West Point speech tonight.   Where the moment calls for a truly audacious – in American political terms – sequence of actions, Obama will only eloquently recite his master’s demands.  Troops.  Bailouts for banks.  All couched in reasonable language as he seeks an accommodation among irreconcilable constituencies and circumstances.  Taking a seemingly moderate way, he’ll lose everything.   Of course, were he to follow Michael Moore’s advice, he’d like find himself in another familiar All American political briar patch:

Goya, The Sleep of Reason Begets Monsters

Advertisements

3 Comments

  1. Spot on as always.

  2. Agreed. Thank you for that, Mr. Jost.

    Obama seems to have overlooked the one Bush/Cheney approach worth adopting: set an agenda and tell your people to accomplish it. Don’t let officials of questionable motives dictate your policy.

  3. Just further smoothing the way for more of the same- killing, waste and profit. About the only thing we manufacture in this country is armaments. You can’t just keep this stuff standing around. It doesn’t appreciate in value. It’s got to be used. It’s a hell of a thing when war and gross consumer spending drive an economy. Some wonder why we’re sinking.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: