"Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful." – Seneca the Younger

In the Name of Religion People and God
You open the newspaper and the first thing you read today is “Woman burnt, raped, 12 churches razed during Orissa bandh” and you wonder, as to why wont religion go away.
Well we may have some answers in regards to this perplexing question. To start with, It is now confirmed (by neurogenetics) that religion like sex is hard-wired into us by evolution and so here to stay. (though there are good reasons for doing that and one can trust evolution) But with the rapidly changing times, there seems to be something amiss from its essential know-how.
When Marx mused and voiced that deadly fact, that religion is like opium, he was not altogether wrong, but on spot, except that he relied too much on the Hegelian sociological make-up rather than the human body itself. Infact advances in the body (neurobiology) has progressed only recently after the collapse of freud-ual block that hindered progress by locking all research to its own underlying understanding of ‘its’ psyche.(I am using ‘its psyche as there is no such thing as a general psyche, but always specific psyches, for example, a Muslim psyche, a Hindu psyche,) The conclusions surprisingly seems not-too-different than what the Buddhist or Hindu yogic text have been saying all along.
Another aspect of religion is that it operates on and from the primordial level of self-experience, which simply means that it generates experience. Which means that there is no way to get into its working via empirical methods or analytics; which is obvious from the fact that a Christian dreams about Christian Icons and Hindu dreams of his and all this arises from the abysmal depths of seething self orienting fields of ones ownmost consciousness or sense making. Roughly translated, this means that all mediation, meditation, and self-reflection into ones own deep and profound religious experience is like the thread of Ariadne which (contrary to the Greek myth) only takes one inside but never takes one out of the Labyrinth, cause the Labyrinth (in the present case and as always) vanishes into the matrix of our own cunning (which is evolutionary bound much like the celebrated idea of vasna), and this evolutionary smartness has today become our Minotaur. Which means in the majority of cases one is only ‘interested in finding out ways to confirm, authenticate, fortify the answers we already have’; that is, what ever the authorities have said and written (and these often change from religion to region, and often with absurd twists.) Though there have been attempts by psychoanalytical schools to separate, filter, categorise and furnish a common base in the form of ‘the varieties of religious experience’, but the fact remains that there is none (knowing the nature of the psyche and that any two can hardly be one, and as every experience re-generates/squeezes itself out of the whole history without which there would be no experience at all, and as we would have no way to know/tell/experience what is this that arises) there are no transcendental common ground as the pseudo-mystics would have us believe.
It is also true that the lack of sameness does make humans extremely insecure, and there lies the root of all our neurotic fanaticism. We have a hard time trying to be what we are not and there arises a point where things just start to crack; thus people are often found seeking pro-actively those very states and situations that simply mirror and bounce their psyches: -for example, my religion, my nation, my language, (Amchi Mumbai) the list can go on and on.
Also religion grounds itself through emotive seizures that are deeply locked in metaphorical self-ligature and this could be the missing link. Metaphors abstracts humans from every other thing, and in this sense it makes us unique in the whole universe; But this abstraction happens ‘Only’ in, within and through the linguistic space that happens to originally ground all our knowing and seeing, that the deep and access enabling loka that names and marks our selves as ‘Self’. -lingering in its womb lies the kernel out of which arises all fundamental self-reflections and the very human self-consciousness ‘itself’, and thus, the loss of metaphors is the loss of self and the self is all-round us with its artefacts that it has put there in and within whose company it becomes itself, feels familiar and secure, and thus what ever disturbs the self disturbs the individual as a whole… So in this sense the pope, mullah and the pundit all three need to sit together and think a bit deeper than they would usually allow themselves to indulge. And as there are no ‘value neutral’ universal ground, guide and rules on which one can stand and decide -judge as to with is right: It becomes quite knotty here. (cause how else are we to make sense as to who we are, and to what and where lies our cahoots) and as all decisions are locked internally, ‘in, within and through the linguistic space that grounds all our knowing and guides all seeing from the outset,’ we enter the realms of the ouroboros (The Tantric symbol of snake eating its own tale… and contrary to Jung’s mystifications, it actually and originally meant, that there is no value free, original and universal ground on which man can stand, and that there are no ways out of the horizons that give rise to our Self and there is no outside of this inside, as all outside is ultimately nothing other than the flourishing of the linguistic and metaphoric powers that guide all our thinking and feeling and mark all seeing-showing from the outset.)
So…as, its turns out, (when it comes to religion, race, self etc.) it becomes a problem of deep language, and the deep histories that breathe it, pronounces it, emerge, make manifest, make present, to spread and transform and convert everything into its own image till the whole world is filled with lookalikes….and when everything has been reduced to a monology of self-sameness, then…then… then what?
May be a little Yoga may help here, Pranayama does not mean just controlling ones breath, but in a deeper and original sense getting inside, regulating, controlling, disciplining, meditating on and upon the deep histories that breathes us, pronounces us emerge, make manifest, make present.
I have tried to explore this side of reality in the funny little story “Bhalu’s Apprenticehood (A battle against Sleep)”
So is there an end to religion, do we require a new body-world, a new brain. After all the body is the world and the brain is the body, none of the three can be separated and isolated out of the other, and this is the hardest part to grasp.
Existence, life, world and being like Brahman is something which is fundamentally a-casual, open and given unconditionally to all and everyone, where one is by ones very givenness (Darshan) open in and having access to the sacred by simply ‘being’ there as that very opening of the openness; But this very opening of the openness, the openness of the Self is now divided, segmented, conditioned, controlled, and thus destroyed by religion -because what divides, conditions controls, destroys what is essentially unconditional, undivided, given, open and a-casual.
Coming back to us and our ways, I am sure there is nothing wrong with us Hindus, except we are no different from our ‘other’ (in-spite of all our sadhus, saints and great books of wisdom.) I am sure the current events and violence would make us Proud. And pride is a strange word, and everyone in his own humble and meek way is proud of his/her culture, its literature, its promise of transcendence and deliverance into sukha from the earthly bondage, its misery and corruption, its pain and dukha, and above all, an access to the divine and godly, and also its sacred etcetera, etcetera, but what is strange and uncanny about all this massive baggage of accumulated (sacred and wise sayings) is the fundamental mystery underlying this sense of ‘A Proud [...]‘ etcetera etcetera. That is; in-spite of it all, we/they have no way to fundamentally transform ourselves, except all this only ends up producing some strange and contrived distortions in our psychic-make-up by fragmenting what is essentially Whole and Holy.
Fundamentally we Hindus today seems to have nothing truly spiritual to fall back upon, thus there is this clinging, holding tight to ones bosom; -like a infantile to his milk-bottle we tightly cling to our books, authorities, which means past, the dead, the ghostly spirits and in the panic and inflation of this falleness we experience ones being as ‘A Proud Hindu’, a proud Christian, a proud Muslim a proud maoist, so on and so forth. (which is essentially a symptom of the lack, a lack of any direct access into the sacred and the spiritual which gets reduced to the infantile “My Papa is the greatest”) Thus we are condemned to live in the past, with ghosts “Bhoots” and their bhava[vis] “Bhavaish-futural projections” that is in and within the spirits of the dead and the ‘non-existing’: -that is find oneself not in ‘being’ but in ‘non-being’ or ‘avidya’”.
Nevertheless it is quite normal and ordinary to blame the other (though there is and always are some underlying causes), nevertheless It is something we always end up doing individually and collectively. Our evolutionary advantage today seems to have become our greatest nemesis -Our Karmic surplus that contains the seeds of its own downfall.
note: (By holy I mean Whole or that which cannot be contained , owned, or divided)
Bhava[Avesa] = from Sanskrit ‘vis‘, to enter into, that is to enter into a state of violent emotion or emotional frenzy, loose one mind into…